StockData

IonQ vs WeRide

IONQ and WRD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IONQ and WRD compare

IonQ grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (377% versus 89.6% for WeRide).

IonQ keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 67.1% compared with −242% at WeRide.

IonQ scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for WeRide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIONQWRD
Size and price
Market cap$11.0B–
Share price$28.88$4.14
Change, 1 year−43.0%−47.8%
Change, 5 years3.1%−80.9%
Beta (5Y)2.720.09
Employees–3,801
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)3
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S28.9×–
P/B2.2×–
FCF yield−6.3%–
Fair value$31.94–
Margin of safety9.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)377% (better)89.6%
Profitability
Gross margin24.1%30.2% (better)
Operating margin−334%−270% (better)
Net margin67.1% (better)−242%
FCF margin−181% (better)−229%
Return on equity7.0%–
Return on invested capital−48.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01–
Interest coverage–−202.3×
Current ratio4.245.36 (better)
Altman Z-score1.73–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−17.8%–
Shareholder yield−17.8%–
Ownership
Held by institutions51.8%3.9%
Held by insiders0.99%10.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.4M–
Short interest, % of float13.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.