Invitation Homes vs LGI Homes
INVH and LGIH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INVH and LGIH compare
Invitation Homes is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as LGI Homes ($15.7B against $1.0B).
On earnings, LGI Homes is cheaper: it trades at 15.6× trailing earnings, against 24.4× for Invitation Homes.
Invitation Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.7% versus −16.7% for LGI Homes).
Invitation Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.1% compared with 3.9% at LGI Homes.
Invitation Homes pays a dividend yielding 4.5%; LGI Homes does not pay one.
Invitation Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for LGI Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INVH | LGIH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.7B | $1.0B |
| Share price | $26.56 | $44.37 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.3% | 4.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.9% | −68.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 1,725 | 1,056 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.4× | 15.6× (better) |
| P/S | 5.5× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 7.9× |
| PEG | 1.62 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 12.7% |
| Fair value | $31.40 | $36.24 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% (better) | −22.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.7% (better) | −16.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | −6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.2% (better) | −57.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.9% (better) | −57.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.4% (better) | −24.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 19.4% |
| Net margin | 23.1% (better) | 3.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 7.7% |
| Return on equity | 7.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 | 1.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 109% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.36% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.5% (better) | −0.36% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 91.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.41% | 12.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 16.2% |
Go deeper
- INVH stock overview
- INVH income statement
- INVH valuation and score
- LGIH stock overview
- LGIH income statement
- LGIH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.