StockData

Innoviva vs Pharming

INVA and PHAR side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INVA and PHAR compare

Pharming grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.6% versus 12.8% for Innoviva).

Innoviva scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Pharming), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINVAPHAR
Size and price
Market cap$1.4B–
Share price$19.03$12.60
Change, 1 year−14.6%−26.5%
Change, 5 years11.6%46.2%
Beta (5Y)0.230.55
Employees15950K
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)8
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score11
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E9.7×–
P/S3.1×–
P/B1.2×–
EV/EBITDA6.2×–
P/FCF7.5×–
PEG0.83–
FCF yield13.3%–
Fair value$31.77–
Margin of safety40.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.8%26.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.1%12.1% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average10.3% (better)−40.8%
Profitability
Gross margin74.5%87.9% (better)
Operating margin38.8% (better)6.9%
Net margin–0.76%
FCF margin41.6% (better)14.3%
Return on invested capital18.0%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.23–
Net debt / EBITDA−1.90–
Interest coverage8.6×132× (better)
Current ratio15.44 (better)2.59
Altman Z-score3.55–
Piotroski F-score–7
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield5.7%–
Shareholder yield5.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions104%0.32%
Held by insiders5.4%0.00%
Short interest, % of float11.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.