StockData

Inuvo vs IZEA Worldwide

INUV and IZEA side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INUV and IZEA compare

IZEA Worldwide is the larger company, worth 6.0 times as much as Inuvo ($38.8M against $6.5M).

IZEA Worldwide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−28.2% versus −46.6% for Inuvo).

Inuvo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.6% compared with −9.4% at IZEA Worldwide.

IZEA Worldwide scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Inuvo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINUVIZEA
Size and price
Market cap$6.5M$38.8M
Share price$0.395$2.23
Change, 1 year−84.3%−56.2%
Change, 5 years−93.8%−72.9%
Beta (5Y)1.321.12
Employees7275
StockData Score
Total score57 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score22
Health score04 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.1× (better)1.5×
P/B0.8× (better)0.8×
FCF yield−55.7%–
Fair value$1.28$1.82
Margin of safety69.2% (better)−22.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−46.6%−28.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.1% (better)11.7%
Profitability
Gross margin63.2% (better)44.7%
Operating margin−18.8%−15.8% (better)
Net margin−8.6% (better)−9.4%
FCF margin−6.9%–
Return on equity−43.9%−5.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−65.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.77 (better)0.00
Interest coverage–−720.6×
Current ratio0.607.83 (better)
Altman Z-score−8.542.04 (better)
Piotroski F-score38 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.31%1.3% (better)
Shareholder yield−0.31%1.3% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions20.1%9.7%
Held by insiders44.8%11.8%
Short interest, % of float4.2%0.36%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.