InterGroup vs New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
INTG and NEN side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INTG and NEN compare
InterGroup is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership ($89.7M against $5.0M).
InterGroup grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.9% versus 12.1% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership).
InterGroup keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.2% compared with −7.6% at New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; InterGroup does not pay one.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for InterGroup), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INTG | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $89.7M | $5.0M |
| Share price | $41.75 | $44.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.1% | −37.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.0% | −27.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Employees | 214 | 16 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 58.8× | – |
| P/S | 1.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | −0.4× |
| P/FCF | 71.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.4% | – |
| Fair value | $16.41 | $3449.03 |
| Margin of safety | −154% | 98.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.9% (better) | 12.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −163% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −29.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 16.0% (better) | 14.0% |
| Net margin | 2.2% (better) | −7.6% |
| FCF margin | 1.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.9× (better) | 0.6× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.44 (better) | 0.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | 36.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.08% | 40.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.9% | 82.3% |
| Held by insiders | 75.7% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $37.4K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | – |
Go deeper
- INTG stock overview
- INTG income statement
- INTG valuation and score
- NEN stock overview
- NEN income statement
- NEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.