International Seaways vs Kirby
INSW and KEX side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INSW and KEX compare
Kirby is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as International Seaways ($6.8B against $5.2B).
On earnings, International Seaways is cheaper: it trades at 5.0× trailing earnings, against 18.7× for Kirby.
International Seaways grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (100% versus 8.5% for Kirby).
International Seaways keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 68.2% compared with 10.4% at Kirby.
International Seaways pays a dividend yielding 12.0%; Kirby does not pay one.
International Seaways scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 12 for Kirby), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INSW | KEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.2B | $6.8B |
| Share price | $105.23 | $129.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 96.5% | 17.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 575% | 137% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 2,763 | 5,233 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.0× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.6× |
| PEG | – | 0.41 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $170.93 | $116.49 |
| Margin of safety | 38.4% (better) | −11.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 100% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.9% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 384% (better) | 22.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 381% (better) | 28.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 69.9% (better) | 14.2% |
| Net margin | 68.2% (better) | 10.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 10.8% |
| Return on equity | 49.0% (better) | 11.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.6% (better) | 8.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 (better) | 0.31 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.20 (better) | 1.30 |
| Interest coverage | 25.2× (better) | 11.7× |
| Current ratio | 6.69 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.15 (better) | 3.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 12.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 59.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 12.0% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 31.8% | 0.78% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$176M | −$16.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.1% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- INSW stock overview
- INSW income statement
- INSW valuation and score
- KEX stock overview
- KEX income statement
- KEX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.