Inseego vs Turtle Beach
INSG and TBCH side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INSG and TBCH compare
Turtle Beach is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Inseego ($292M against $66.2M).
Inseego grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.6% versus −13.0% for Turtle Beach).
Turtle Beach keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.17% compared with −12.9% at Inseego.
Inseego scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Turtle Beach), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INSG | TBCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $66.2M | $292M |
| Share price | $4.03 | $16.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −67.6% | 6.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.4% | −39.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.03 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 275 | 290 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 35.2× | 7.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.8% | 14.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.34 | $8.20 |
| Margin of safety | 61.0% (better) | −98.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.6% (better) | −13.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −11.9% | −2.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −108% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −20.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.3% (better) | 36.5% |
| Operating margin | −10.4% | 3.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.9% | −0.17% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.2% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −0.53% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.93 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.20 |
| Current ratio | 0.93 | 1.94 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −12.17 | 2.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 10.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 10.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.9% | 73.9% |
| Held by insiders | 88.9% | 17.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 130% | 24.5% |
Go deeper
- INSG stock overview
- INSG income statement
- INSG valuation and score
- TBCH stock overview
- TBCH income statement
- TBCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.