StockData

Innodata vs trivago

INOD and TRVG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INOD and TRVG compare

Innodata grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.9% versus 19.1% for trivago).

Innodata keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.8% compared with 2.0% at trivago.

Innodata scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for trivago), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINODTRVG
Size and price
Market cap$1.2B–
Share price$35.46$4.15
Change, 1 year−42.8%29.7%
Change, 5 years390%−65.8%
Beta (5Y)2.760.74
Employees10K893
StockData Score
Total score18 (better)9
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)3
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E25.9×–
P/S3.5×–
P/B6.9×–
EV/EBITDA16.2×–
P/FCF14.7×–
FCF yield6.8%–
Fair value$59.56–
Margin of safety40.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)46.9% (better)19.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average34.0% (better)17.1%
Net income growth (TTM)44.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)34.3%–
EPS growth, 5Y average115%–
Profitability
Gross margin–97.3%
Operating margin–0.28%
Net margin13.8% (better)2.0%
FCF margin23.7%–
Return on equity35.4% (better)5.5%
Return on invested capital–2.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–37.3×
Current ratio2.84 (better)2.22
Altman Z-score10.30–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions57.1%2.0%
Held by insiders14.1%14.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$161M−$281K (better)
Short interest, % of float17.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.