StockData

Inlif vs Tungray Technologies

INLF and TRSG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INLF and TRSG compare

Tungray Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.0% versus 16.5% for Inlif).

Tungray Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.1% compared with −29.6% at Inlif.

Inlif scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Tungray Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINLFTRSG
Size and price
Share price$0.515$1.17
Change, 1 year−100.0%−16.1%
Beta (5Y)2.820.64
Employees1615
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score00
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)16.5%22.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−439%–
EPS growth (TTM)−354%–
Profitability
Gross margin23.3%45.9% (better)
Operating margin−31.6%−1.5% (better)
Net margin−29.6%−1.1% (better)
FCF margin−11.3% (better)−24.6%
Return on equity−12.5%−0.96% (better)
Return on invested capital−18.9%−1.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.10–
Interest coverage−37.0×−3.6× (better)
Current ratio5.65 (better)1.94
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.43%–
Held by insiders99.1%80.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$27.3K–
Short interest, % of float2617%0.58%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.