Inlif vs Taylor Devices
INLF and TAYD side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INLF and TAYD compare
Inlif grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus −12.5% for Taylor Devices).
Taylor Devices keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.5% compared with −29.6% at Inlif.
Taylor Devices scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Inlif), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INLF | TAYD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $188M |
| Share price | $0.515 | $58.14 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 406% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.82 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 16 | 135 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 4.8× |
| P/B | – | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.5% |
| Fair value | – | $39.50 |
| Margin of safety | – | −47.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.5% (better) | −12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −439% | −23.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −354% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 54.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.3% | 41.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −31.6% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −29.6% | 17.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −11.3% | 31.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.5% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −18.9% | 19.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.10 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −37.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 5.65 | 8.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 17.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.43% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 99.1% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $27.3K (better) | −$897K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2617% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- INLF stock overview
- INLF income statement
- INLF valuation and score
- TAYD stock overview
- TAYD income statement
- TAYD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.