StockData

Inlif vs Serve Robotics

INLF and SERV side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INLF and SERV compare

Serve Robotics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (411% versus 16.5% for Inlif).

Inlif keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −29.6% compared with −2079% at Serve Robotics.

Serve Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Inlif), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINLFSERV
Size and price
Market cap–$274M
Share price$0.700$3.17
Change, 1 year−100.0%−70.3%
Beta (5Y)3.001.13
Employees1610
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–27.6×
P/B–0.9×
FCF yield–−64.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)16.5%411% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−439%–
EPS growth (TTM)−354%–
Profitability
Gross margin23.3% (better)−322%
Operating margin−31.6% (better)−2207%
Net margin−29.6% (better)−2079%
FCF margin−11.3% (better)−1785%
Return on equity−12.5% (better)−70.2%
Return on invested capital−18.9% (better)−192%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.10 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−37.0× (better)−219337.0×
Current ratio5.6510.85 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.19
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−34.6%
Shareholder yield–−34.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.43%37.5%
Held by insiders99.1%10.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$27.3K (better)−$3.1M
Short interest, % of float2617%41.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.