StockData

Inlif vs Ouster

INLF and OUST side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INLF and OUST compare

Ouster grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (62.8% versus 16.5% for Inlif).

Ouster keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −26.0% compared with −29.6% at Inlif.

Ouster scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Inlif), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINLFOUST
Size and price
Market cap–$2.8B
Share price$0.700$38.22
Change, 1 year−100.0%48.9%
Change, 5 years–−42.2%
Beta (5Y)3.002.42
Employees16204
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–13.5×
P/B–7.4×
FCF yield–−3.0%
Fair value–$12.90
Margin of safety–−196%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)16.5%62.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–55.0%
Net income growth (TTM)−439%–
EPS growth (TTM)−354%–
Profitability
Gross margin23.3%49.6% (better)
Operating margin−31.6%−30.6% (better)
Net margin−29.6%−26.0% (better)
FCF margin−11.3% (better)−40.2%
Return on equity−12.5% (better)−18.0%
Return on invested capital−18.9% (better)−98.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.10 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−37.0×–
Current ratio5.65 (better)4.16
Altman Z-score–13.66
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.43%49.6%
Held by insiders99.1%4.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months$27.3K (better)−$47.3M
Short interest, % of float2617%10.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.