StockData

Inlif vs Nauticus Robotics

INLF and KITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INLF and KITT compare

Nauticus Robotics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.4% versus 16.5% for Inlif).

Inlif keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −29.6% compared with −1132% at Nauticus Robotics.

Nauticus Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Inlif), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINLFKITT
Size and price
Market cap–$9.0M
Share price$0.515$1.21
Change, 1 year−100.0%−98.3%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)2.820.59
Employees1651
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score01 (better)
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.2×
P/B–1.7×
Fair value–$5.08
Margin of safety–76.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)16.5%32.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−439%–
EPS growth (TTM)−354%–
Profitability
Gross margin23.3% (better)−205%
Operating margin−31.6% (better)−568%
Net margin−29.6% (better)−1132%
FCF margin−11.3%–
Return on equity−12.5%–
Return on invested capital−18.9% (better)−142%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.100.06 (better)
Interest coverage−37.0×−2.8× (better)
Current ratio5.65 (better)0.13
Altman Z-score–−16.14
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−183%
Shareholder yield–−183%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.43%8.6%
Held by insiders99.1%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$27.3K (better)−$4.4M
Short interest, % of float2617%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.