StockData

INNO vs Marwynn

INHD and MWYN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INHD and MWYN compare

Marwynn is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as INNO ($26.1M against $6.7M).

Marwynn grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (603% versus 146% for INNO).

Marwynn keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −24.7% compared with −72.7% at INNO.

Marwynn scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for INNO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINHDMWYN
Size and price
Market cap$6.7M$26.1M
Share price$2.65$1.29
Change, 1 year−99.5%37.0%
Beta (5Y)0.480.01
Employees42
StockData Score
Total score67 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score36 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.2× (better)4.9×
P/B0.1× (better)10.4×
Fair value–$0.281
Margin of safety–−359%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)146%603% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin3.7%16.0% (better)
Operating margin−67.9%−13.8% (better)
Net margin−72.7%−24.7% (better)
Return on equity−7.2% (better)−54.7%
Return on invested capital−13.2% (better)−24.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Current ratio137.23 (better)4.94
Altman Z-score9.6824.08 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−693%–
Shareholder yield−693%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions1.6%1.9%
Held by insiders–29.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$0
Short interest, % of float–3.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.