StockData

Infleqtion vs D-Wave Quantum

INFQ and QBTS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INFQ and QBTS compare

D-Wave Quantum is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Infleqtion ($3.9B against $2.0B).

Infleqtion keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −241% compared with −2002% at D-Wave Quantum.

Infleqtion scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for D-Wave Quantum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINFQQBTS
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B$3.9B
Share price$8.88$10.65
Change, 1 year−54.4%−68.9%
Change, 5 years–8.5%
Beta (5Y)1.982.01
Employees205388
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S48.7× (better)317×
P/B3.5× (better)3.6×
FCF yield–−3.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–−44.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–36.7%
Profitability
Gross margin28.9%64.2% (better)
Operating margin−200% (better)−1373%
Net margin−241% (better)−2002%
FCF margin–−958%
Return on equity−52.4%−28.0% (better)
Return on invested capital–−56.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.03 (better)
Current ratio9.3420.55 (better)
Altman Z-score17.7530.14 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions40.9%53.5%
Held by insiders10.3%1.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$541M−$107M (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float12.4%19.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.