IMAX vs Eastman Kodak
IMAX and KODK side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IMAX and KODK compare
IMAX is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Eastman Kodak ($2.6B against $796M).
IMAX grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.1% versus 9.5% for Eastman Kodak).
IMAX keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.7% compared with −8.3% at Eastman Kodak.
IMAX scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Eastman Kodak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IMAX | KODK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $796M |
| Share price | $48.29 | $8.13 |
| Change, 1 year | 34.4% | −3.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 164% | 23.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.45 |
| Employees | 679 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.9× | – |
| P/S | 5.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 5.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.5× | 9.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | 58.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $79.21 | $12.54 |
| Margin of safety | 39.0% (better) | 35.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.1% (better) | 9.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.5% (better) | 0.77% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 239% (better) | −955% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 225% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.5% (better) | 24.1% |
| Operating margin | 26.8% (better) | 2.8% |
| Net margin | 27.7% (better) | −8.3% |
| FCF margin | 30.2% | 40.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 31.9% (better) | −16.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 52.9% (better) | 4.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.18 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −3.45 |
| Interest coverage | 17.4× (better) | 0.7× |
| Current ratio | – | 2.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.34 (better) | 1.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.88% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.88% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.7% | 38.5% |
| Held by insiders | 21.6% | 28.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$70.2M | $20.6K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.6% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- IMAX stock overview
- IMAX income statement
- IMAX valuation and score
- KODK stock overview
- KODK income statement
- KODK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.