Illumina vs 10x Genomics
ILMN and TXG side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ILMN and TXG compare
Illumina is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as 10x Genomics ($35.6B against $9.1B).
Illumina grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.8% versus −4.3% for 10x Genomics).
Illumina keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.7% compared with −12.2% at 10x Genomics.
Illumina scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for 10x Genomics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ILMN | TXG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.6B | $9.1B |
| Share price | $235.99 | $70.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 148% | 443% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.7% | −60.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 2.05 |
| Employees | 52 | 1,178 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.5× | – |
| P/S | 7.9× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/B | 11.3× | 11.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 33.7× (better) | 75.2× |
| FCF yield | 3.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Fair value | $191.74 | $26.97 |
| Margin of safety | −23.1% (better) | −160% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% (better) | −4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 30.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.9% | 70.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 21.2% (better) | −14.3% |
| Net margin | 19.7% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | 23.3% (better) | 19.7% |
| Return on equity | 32.4% (better) | −9.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 28.5% (better) | −23.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.57 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.47 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.63 | 5.69 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.33 | 25.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.86% | 4.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$593M | −$16.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 12.3% |
Go deeper
- ILMN stock overview
- ILMN income statement
- ILMN valuation and score
- TXG stock overview
- TXG income statement
- TXG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.