StockData

Intelligent Living Application vs INNO

ILAG and INHD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ILAG and INHD compare

INNO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (146% versus −40.1% for Intelligent Living Application).

INNO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −72.7% compared with −431% at Intelligent Living Application.

INNO scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Intelligent Living Application), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricILAGINHD
Size and price
Market cap–$6.7M
Share price$1.75$2.65
Change, 1 year−65.3%−99.5%
Beta (5Y)0.140.48
Employees1984
StockData Score
Total score26 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.2×
P/B–0.1×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−40.1%146% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−16.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin2.9%3.7% (better)
Operating margin−431%−67.9% (better)
Net margin−431%−72.7% (better)
FCF margin−54.6%–
Return on equity−221%−7.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−174%−13.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.320.00 (better)
Interest coverage−412.5×–
Current ratio1.97137.23 (better)
Altman Z-score–9.68
Piotroski F-score15 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−693%
Shareholder yield–−693%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.5%1.6%
Held by insiders69.5%–
Short interest, % of float0.67%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.