InterContinental Hotels vs Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
IHG and WH side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IHG and WH compare
InterContinental Hotels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus −2.2% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts).
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.7% compared with 14.6% at InterContinental Hotels.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; InterContinental Hotels does not pay one.
InterContinental Hotels scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IHG | WH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $5.6B |
| Share price | $169.66 | $75.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.6% | 2.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 133% | −13.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 7,459 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 27.5× |
| P/S | – | 3.9× |
| P/B | – | 11.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.8% |
| Fair value | – | $51.73 |
| Margin of safety | – | −45.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.4% (better) | −2.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 20.7% (better) | −37.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.3% (better) | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 23.1% | 30.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 14.6% | 14.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.8% | 22.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 39.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 594% (better) | 10.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.43 (better) | 5.30 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.98 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | 35.6% | 61.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 9.6% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$15.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 10.4% |
Go deeper
- IHG stock overview
- IHG income statement
- IHG valuation and score
- WH stock overview
- WH income statement
- WH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.