StockData

International Flavors & Fragrances vs Methanex

IFF and MEOH side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IFF and MEOH compare

Methanex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −4.6% for International Flavors & Fragrances).

International Flavors & Fragrances pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Methanex does not pay one.

International Flavors & Fragrances scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Methanex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIFFMEOH
Size and price
Market cap$23.7B–
Share price$93.02$71.57
Change, 1 year47.0%111%
Change, 5 years−35.2%51.8%
Beta (5Y)0.980.71
Employees22K–
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)4
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score33
Dividend score2 (better)0
Valuation
P/S2.4×–
P/B1.7×–
EV/EBITDA17.0×–
P/FCF44.0×–
FCF yield2.3%–
Fair value$104.59–
Margin of safety11.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.6%−3.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average16.5% (better)6.3%
EPS growth (TTM)–−61.1%
Profitability
Gross margin37.5% (better)35.7%
Operating margin7.6%12.0% (better)
FCF margin5.4%25.5% (better)
Return on invested capital3.0%7.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.41 (better)1.13
Net debt / EBITDA3.012.65 (better)
Interest coverage4.0× (better)2.0×
Current ratio2.06 (better)2.06
Altman Z-score1.81–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1.7%–
Years of dividend growth01 (better)
Dividend growth, 5Y average−12.0%9.4% (better)
Shareholder yield1.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions111%76.2%
Held by insiders1.2%15.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$31.1M–
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float6.4%3.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.