StockData

Infobird vs Taoping

IFBD and TAOP side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IFBD and TAOP compare

Infobird grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (506% versus 219% for Taoping).

Taoping keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −452% compared with −616% at Infobird.

Infobird scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Taoping), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIFBDTAOP
Size and price
Share price$1.51$0.298
Change, 1 year25.8%−86.5%
Change, 5 years−100.0%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.941.15
Employees1163
StockData Score
Total score3 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score11
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)506% (better)219%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−9.7% (better)−27.4%
Profitability
Gross margin29.5%151% (better)
Operating margin−607%−415% (better)
Net margin−616%−452% (better)
FCF margin–−175%
Return on equity−154%−63.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−140%−34.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.65
Interest coverage−104.8×−9.4× (better)
Current ratio1.301.63 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.00%
Held by insiders0.00%6.7%
Short interest, % of float0.77%0.43%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.