StockData

T Stamp vs TaoWeave

IDAI and TWAV side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IDAI and TWAV compare

T Stamp is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as TaoWeave ($14.2M against $4.8M).

T Stamp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.1% versus −0.59% for TaoWeave).

TaoWeave keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −120% compared with −441% at T Stamp.

TaoWeave scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for T Stamp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIDAITWAV
Size and price
Market cap$14.2M$4.8M
Share price$2.51$1.23
Change, 1 year−46.1%−53.1%
Change, 5 years−87.8%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)−0.031.87
Employees97
StockData Score
Total score210 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S4.1×2.0× (better)
P/B3.1×0.7× (better)
FCF yield−69.3%–
Fair value$1.39$2.61
Margin of safety−80.2%52.9% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.1% (better)−0.59%
Revenue growth, 5Y average28.3% (better)−30.8%
Profitability
Gross margin–53.3%
Operating margin−247%−112% (better)
Net margin−441%−120% (better)
FCF margin−285%–
Return on equity−428%−33.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−496%−39.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24 (better)0.00
Current ratio6.48 (better)5.96
Altman Z-score−8.58 (better)−38.10
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−70.9%–
Shareholder yield−70.9%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions5.5%5.1%
Held by insiders32.5%7.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$65.3K (better)$0
Short interest, % of float2.5%0.84%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.