StockData

SeaStar Medical vs Pulse Biosciences

ICU and PLSE side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICU and PLSE compare

Pulse Biosciences is the larger company, worth 974 times as much as SeaStar Medical ($3.6B against $3.7M).

Pulse Biosciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1637% versus 146% for SeaStar Medical).

SeaStar Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −678% compared with −5604% at Pulse Biosciences.

Pulse Biosciences scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for SeaStar Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICUPLSE
Size and price
Market cap$3.7M$3.6B
Share price$0.838$50.44
Change, 1 year−83.2%236%
Change, 5 years−100.0%137%
Beta (5Y)0.801.24
Employees17116
StockData Score
Total score28 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score00
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.7× (better)2408×
P/B7.9× (better)19.6×
FCF yield–−1.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)146%1637% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin92.6% (better)26.8%
Operating margin−692% (better)−5821%
Net margin−678% (better)−5604%
FCF margin–−4264%
Return on equity−246%−60.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−516.9×–
Current ratio1.0314.35 (better)
Altman Z-score−51.53115.81 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−93.8%–
Shareholder yield−93.8%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions28.1%15.0%
Held by insiders6.5%71.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$8.5K$23.9M (better)
Short interest, % of float–14.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.