StockData

ICL vs Methanex

ICL and MEOH side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICL and MEOH compare

ICL grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.6% versus −3.5% for Methanex).

ICL scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Methanex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICLMEOH
Size and price
Share price$4.52$70.51
Change, 1 year−17.8%82.6%
Change, 5 years−52.3%63.3%
Beta (5Y)0.740.71
Employees13K–
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.6% (better)−3.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.2% (better)6.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−44.5%–
EPS growth (TTM)−43.8% (better)−61.1%
EPS growth, 5Y average78.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin30.6%35.7% (better)
Operating margin8.1%12.0% (better)
Net margin3.2%–
FCF margin–25.5%
Return on equity3.9%–
Return on invested capital4.8%7.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.39 (better)1.13
Net debt / EBITDA1.70 (better)2.65
Interest coverage1.9×2.0× (better)
Current ratio1.332.06 (better)
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio99.1%–
Years of dividend growth–1
Dividend growth, 5Y average–9.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions15.2%76.2%
Held by insiders0.02%15.3%
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float0.29%3.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.