ICF International vs RMR
ICFI and RMR side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ICFI and RMR compare
ICF International is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as RMR ($1.5B against $537M).
On earnings, ICF International is cheaper: it trades at 15.3× trailing earnings, against 27.5× for RMR.
ICF International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.2% versus −8.2% for RMR).
ICF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with 1.7% at RMR.
Both pay dividends: ICF International yields 0.69% and RMR 10.7%.
ICF International scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 8 for RMR), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ICFI | RMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $537M |
| Share price | $81.26 | $16.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.1% | 7.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −22.7% | −53.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 8,400 | 50K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.3× (better) | 27.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× (better) | 11.0× |
| P/FCF | 7.8× | – |
| PEG | 1.13 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.8% | – |
| Fair value | $129.52 | $16.58 |
| Margin of safety | 37.3% (better) | −1.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.2% (better) | −8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2.4% (better) | −39.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.19% (better) | −40.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% (better) | −22.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 8.1% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net margin | 5.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | 10.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.1% (better) | 4.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 20.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.34 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.86 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.3× (better) | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.40 | 1.69 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.74 | 3.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 10.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 10.6% | 287% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% | 11.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 43.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ICFI stock overview
- ICFI income statement
- ICFI valuation and score
- RMR stock overview
- RMR income statement
- RMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.