StockData

IceCure Medical vs Pulse Biosciences

ICCM and PLSE side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICCM and PLSE compare

Pulse Biosciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1637% versus 2.7% for IceCure Medical).

IceCure Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −446% compared with −5604% at Pulse Biosciences.

Pulse Biosciences scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for IceCure Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICCMPLSE
Size and price
Market cap–$3.6B
Share price$0.730$50.44
Change, 1 year−96.6%236%
Change, 5 years−99.6%137%
Beta (5Y)0.691.24
Employees67116
StockData Score
Total score28 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score00
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2408×
P/B–19.6×
FCF yield–−1.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.7%1637% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.7%–
EPS growth (TTM)−20.0%–
EPS growth, 5Y average1.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin36.3% (better)26.8%
Operating margin−447% (better)−5821%
Net margin−446% (better)−5604%
FCF margin−432% (better)−4264%
Return on equity−204%−60.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Current ratio2.8714.35 (better)
Altman Z-score–115.81
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions3.8%15.0%
Held by insiders–71.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$23.9M
Short interest, % of float–14.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.