StockData

ImmuCell vs Trinity Biotech

ICCC and TRIB side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICCC and TRIB compare

ImmuCell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus −28.9% for Trinity Biotech).

ImmuCell keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with −85.4% at Trinity Biotech.

ImmuCell scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 1 for Trinity Biotech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICCCTRIB
Size and price
Market cap$92.8M–
Share price$10.22$5.88
Change, 1 year63.0%−78.2%
Change, 5 years15.6%−98.0%
Beta (5Y)0.101.43
Employees73287
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E51.1×–
P/S2.8×–
P/B2.8×–
EV/EBITDA13.3×–
P/FCF17.2×–
FCF yield5.8%–
Fair value$8.80–
Margin of safety−16.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.6% (better)−28.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.5% (better)−15.6%
Net income growth (TTM)−19.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)−23.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin40.8% (better)38.6%
Operating margin14.5% (better)−36.1%
Net margin5.7% (better)−85.4%
FCF margin16.3% (better)−13.7%
Return on equity6.0%–
Return on invested capital13.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.00–
Interest coverage12.2× (better)−0.7×
Current ratio4.61 (better)0.25
Altman Z-score4.81–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions14.7%0.01%
Held by insiders13.6%51.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$156K–
Short interest, % of float0.19%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.