StockData

ImmuCell vs Anbio Biotechnology

ICCC and NNNN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICCC and NNNN compare

ImmuCell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus 5.6% for Anbio Biotechnology).

Anbio Biotechnology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 74.1% compared with 5.7% at ImmuCell.

ImmuCell scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Anbio Biotechnology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICCCNNNN
Size and price
Market cap$97.6M–
Share price$10.75$3.82
Change, 1 year75.4%−83.0%
Change, 5 years21.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.111.55
Employees7327
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)11
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score45 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E53.8×–
P/S2.9×–
P/B3.0×–
EV/EBITDA14.0×–
P/FCF18.1×–
FCF yield5.5%–
Fair value$8.85–
Margin of safety−21.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.6% (better)5.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.5%–
Net income growth (TTM)−19.1%170% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−23.1%163% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin40.8%87.2% (better)
Operating margin14.5%66.7% (better)
Net margin5.7%74.1% (better)
FCF margin16.3%–
Return on equity6.0%27.0% (better)
Return on invested capital13.8%48.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−0.00–
Interest coverage12.2×–
Current ratio4.61344.31 (better)
Altman Z-score5.00–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions14.7%–
Held by insiders13.6%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$156K–
Short interest, % of float0.19%0.02%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.