StockData

Ibotta vs MNTN

IBTA and MNTN side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IBTA and MNTN compare

Ibotta is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as MNTN ($1.3B against $377M).

MNTN grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.6% versus −6.6% for Ibotta).

MNTN keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.8% compared with −3.2% at Ibotta.

MNTN scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Ibotta), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIBTAMNTN
Size and price
Market cap$1.3B$377M
Share price$57.59$5.04
Change, 1 year76.0%−64.7%
Change, 5 years127%–
Beta (5Y)−0.240.54
Employees800534
StockData Score
Total score914 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score23 (better)
Health score66
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.9×1.2× (better)
P/B5.5×1.1× (better)
EV/EBITDA–2.7×
P/FCF17.9×–
FCF yield5.6%–
Fair value$28.42$10.68
Margin of safety−103%52.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−6.6%18.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−111%–
Profitability
Gross margin78.2%80.7% (better)
Operating margin−3.5%14.2% (better)
Net margin−3.2%17.8% (better)
FCF margin21.7%–
Return on equity−3.7%18.5% (better)
Return on invested capital−9.6%48.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.717.10 (better)
Altman Z-score3.865.74 (better)
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield12.3%–
Shareholder yield12.3% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions60.3%51.3%
Held by insiders92.4%38.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$115M−$10.3M (better)
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float151%7.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.