Iamgold vs West Fraser Timber
IAG and WFG side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IAG and WFG compare
Iamgold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.7% versus −11.5% for West Fraser Timber).
Iamgold scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for West Fraser Timber), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IAG | WFG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $17.32 | $66.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.1% | 10.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 448% | −23.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.34 | 0.68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 74.7% (better) | −11.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.1% (better) | 4.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 66.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.3% (better) | 23.4% |
| Operating margin | 38.3% (better) | −21.7% |
| FCF margin | 29.8% (better) | −5.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.21 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.7× (better) | −62.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.75 | 2.13 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.0% | 49.6% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 10.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- IAG stock overview
- IAG income statement
- IAG valuation and score
- WFG stock overview
- WFG income statement
- WFG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.