Iamgold vs Pan American Silver
IAG and PAAS side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IAG and PAAS compare
Iamgold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.7% versus 28.4% for Pan American Silver).
Iamgold scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Pan American Silver), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IAG | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $15.45 | $37.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 34.5% | 8.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 410% | 46.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 0.91 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 74.7% (better) | 28.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.1% | 22.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.0% | 726% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 66.2% (better) | 24.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.3% (better) | 38.8% |
| Operating margin | 38.3% (better) | 34.1% |
| FCF margin | 29.8% (better) | 28.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.6% (better) | 17.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 | 0.10 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.21 (better) | −0.29 |
| Interest coverage | 9.7× | 411× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.75 | 2.69 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.0% | 51.7% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | – |
Go deeper
- IAG stock overview
- IAG income statement
- IAG valuation and score
- PAAS stock overview
- PAAS income statement
- PAAS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.