MarineMax vs CarParts.com
HZO and PRTS side by side, both in automotive dealers and gasoline service stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HZO and PRTS compare
MarineMax is the larger company, worth 21 times as much as CarParts.com ($1.2B against $55.7M).
MarineMax grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.4% versus −10.7% for CarParts.com).
MarineMax keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.18% compared with −5.4% at CarParts.com.
MarineMax scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for CarParts.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HZO | PRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $55.7M |
| Share price | $52.76 | $6.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | 2.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −4.5% | −95.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 3,385 | 741 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 377× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 15.3% (better) | −20.4% |
| Fair value | – | $11.92 |
| Margin of safety | – | 42.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.4% (better) | −10.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.2% (better) | 33.0% |
| Operating margin | 3.0% (better) | −5.3% |
| Net margin | 0.18% (better) | −5.4% |
| FCF margin | 8.1% (better) | −2.2% |
| Return on equity | 0.42% (better) | −46.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% (better) | −71.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.77 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.1× (better) | −14.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −33.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −33.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.4% | 10.5% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 22.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.9% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- HZO stock overview
- HZO income statement
- HZO valuation and score
- PRTS stock overview
- PRTS income statement
- PRTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.