MarineMax vs O Reilly Automotive
HZO and ORLY side by side, both in automotive dealers and gasoline service stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HZO and ORLY compare
O Reilly Automotive is the larger company, worth 61 times as much as MarineMax ($71.3B against $1.2B).
On earnings, O Reilly Automotive is cheaper: it trades at 28.1× trailing earnings, against 377× for MarineMax.
O Reilly Automotive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −5.4% for MarineMax).
O Reilly Automotive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 0.18% at MarineMax.
O Reilly Automotive scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for MarineMax), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HZO | ORLY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $71.3B |
| Share price | $52.76 | $88.12 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | −6.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −4.5% | 107% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.47 |
| Employees | 3,385 | 93K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 377× | 28.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.8× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/FCF | 6.5× (better) | 33.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.80 |
| FCF yield | 15.3% (better) | 3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $61.78 |
| Margin of safety | – | −42.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.4% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 12.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.2% | 51.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.0% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.18% | 14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.1% | 11.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.42% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% | 60.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.77 | 1.62 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.1× | 14.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.23 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 | 3.54 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.4% | 88.5% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$11.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.9% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- HZO stock overview
- HZO income statement
- HZO valuation and score
- ORLY stock overview
- ORLY income statement
- ORLY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.