Hyperfine vs QT Imaging
HYPR and QTI side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HYPR and QTI compare
Hyperfine is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as QT Imaging ($66.7M against $27.5M).
QT Imaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (157% versus 80.0% for Hyperfine).
QT Imaging keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −54.6% compared with −156% at Hyperfine.
Hyperfine scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for QT Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HYPR | QTI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $66.7M | $27.5M |
| Share price | $0.629 | $1.88 |
| Change, 1 year | −42.8% | −69.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.7% | −98.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.05 |
| Employees | 102 | 32 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.5× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 10.4× |
| FCF yield | −41.8% (better) | −51.3% |
| Fair value | $0.774 | – |
| Margin of safety | 18.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 80.0% | 157% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 115% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.6% (better) | 40.2% |
| Operating margin | −168% | −24.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −156% | −54.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −146% | −47.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −102% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −403% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 1.47 |
| Current ratio | 5.10 (better) | 2.78 |
| Altman Z-score | −7.63 | −1.63 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −94.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −94.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.6% | 22.3% |
| Held by insiders | 18.1% | 91.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$91.9K | $155K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | – |
Go deeper
- HYPR stock overview
- HYPR income statement
- HYPR valuation and score
- QTI stock overview
- QTI income statement
- QTI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.