StockData

Hyperfine vs Nano-X Imaging

HYPR and NNOX side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HYPR and NNOX compare

Hyperfine grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.0% versus 15.4% for Nano-X Imaging).

Hyperfine keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −156% compared with −576% at Nano-X Imaging.

Hyperfine scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Nano-X Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHYPRNNOX
Size and price
Market cap$66.7M–
Share price$0.629$0.322
Change, 1 year−42.8%−89.4%
Change, 5 years−93.7%−98.3%
Beta (5Y)1.031.37
Employees102197
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score11
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.5×–
P/B2.1×–
FCF yield−41.8%–
Fair value$0.774–
Margin of safety18.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)80.0% (better)15.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average115%–
Profitability
Gross margin52.6% (better)−98.2%
Operating margin−168% (better)−601%
Net margin−156% (better)−576%
FCF margin−146% (better)−346%
Return on equity−102%−63.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−403%−59.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.420.04 (better)
Current ratio5.10 (better)2.84
Altman Z-score−7.63–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions20.6%13.9%
Held by insiders18.1%10.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$91.9K$190K (better)
Short interest, % of float4.5%9.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.