Hydrofarm vs Tandy Leather Factory
HYFM and TLF side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HYFM and TLF compare
Tandy Leather Factory is the larger company, worth 5.4 times as much as Hydrofarm ($18.0M against $3.4M).
Tandy Leather Factory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.4% versus −34.1% for Hydrofarm).
Tandy Leather Factory keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.1% compared with −267% at Hydrofarm.
Tandy Leather Factory pays a dividend yielding 34.1%; Hydrofarm does not pay one.
Tandy Leather Factory scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 1 for Hydrofarm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HYFM | TLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4M | $18.0M |
| Share price | $0.696 | $2.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −71.5% | −25.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −58.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.65 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 251 | 538 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| FCF yield | −158% | −12.8% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $7.13 |
| Margin of safety | – | 69.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −34.1% | 3.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −115% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −116% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.4% | 59.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −253% | −0.49% (better) |
| Net margin | −267% | −2.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.0% | −3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −536% | −3.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −135% | −0.75% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −16.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 4.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −20.98 | 2.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 34.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 34.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.3% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 20.9% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.4K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.5% | 0.06% |
Go deeper
- HYFM stock overview
- HYFM income statement
- HYFM valuation and score
- TLF stock overview
- TLF income statement
- TLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.