Hydrofarm vs Natural Health Trends
HYFM and NHTC side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HYFM and NHTC compare
Natural Health Trends is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Hydrofarm ($6.3M against $3.4M).
Natural Health Trends grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−16.5% versus −34.1% for Hydrofarm).
Natural Health Trends keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.2% compared with −267% at Hydrofarm.
Natural Health Trends pays a dividend yielding 53.7%; Hydrofarm does not pay one.
Natural Health Trends scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 1 for Hydrofarm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HYFM | NHTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4M | $6.3M |
| Share price | $0.710 | $0.746 |
| Change, 1 year | −60.6% | −79.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −89.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.59 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 251 | 120 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| FCF yield | −155% | −73.7% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $2.95 |
| Margin of safety | – | 74.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −34.1% | −16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | −8.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.4% | 74.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −253% | −5.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −267% | −4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.0% (better) | −13.7% |
| Return on equity | −536% | −6.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −135% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −16.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 2.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −20.98 | −0.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 53.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 53.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.3% | 12.2% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.6K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.5% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- HYFM stock overview
- HYFM income statement
- HYFM valuation and score
- NHTC stock overview
- NHTC income statement
- NHTC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.