Hydrofarm vs Coffee
HYFM and JVA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HYFM and JVA compare
Coffee is the larger company, worth 8.5 times as much as Hydrofarm ($28.9M against $3.4M).
Coffee grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus −34.1% for Hydrofarm).
Coffee keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with −267% at Hydrofarm.
Coffee pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Hydrofarm does not pay one.
Coffee scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 1 for Hydrofarm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HYFM | JVA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4M | $28.9M |
| Share price | $0.710 | $5.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −60.6% | 27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | 12.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.59 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 251 | 92 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 6.1× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.6× |
| FCF yield | −155% | 27.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $13.10 |
| Margin of safety | – | 61.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −34.1% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 154% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 159% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.4% | 19.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −253% | 6.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −267% | 4.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −536% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −135% | 18.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −16.8× | 24.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 4.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −20.98 | 6.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.3% | 18.7% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | 5.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.6K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.5% | 0.50% |
Go deeper
- HYFM stock overview
- HYFM income statement
- HYFM valuation and score
- JVA stock overview
- JVA income statement
- JVA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.