StockData

Hydrofarm vs Ispire Technology

HYFM and ISPR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HYFM and ISPR compare

Ispire Technology is the larger company, worth 28 times as much as Hydrofarm ($100M against $3.6M).

Ispire Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−21.3% versus −34.1% for Hydrofarm).

Ispire Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −39.0% compared with −267% at Hydrofarm.

Ispire Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Hydrofarm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHYFMISPR
Size and price
Market cap$3.6M$100M
Share price$0.750$1.74
Change, 1 year−65.0%7.4%
Change, 5 years−99.8%–
Beta (5Y)2.591.14
Employees25188
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score04 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0× (better)1.1×
FCF yield−147%−1.3% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−34.1%−21.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−17.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin9.4%12.5% (better)
Operating margin−253%−38.7% (better)
Net margin−267%−39.0% (better)
FCF margin−5.0%−1.4% (better)
Return on equity−536%–
Return on invested capital−135%–
Financial health
Interest coverage−16.8× (better)−111.1×
Current ratio0.271.01 (better)
Altman Z-score−20.98−2.11 (better)
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.3%7.3%
Held by insiders26.5%3.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$12.6K (better)$930
Short interest, % of float14.5%0.96%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.