Hyster-Yale vs Terex
HY and TEX side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HY and TEX compare
Terex is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Hyster-Yale ($6.5B against $513M).
Terex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.1% versus −14.2% for Hyster-Yale).
Terex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with −3.9% at Hyster-Yale.
Both pay dividends: Hyster-Yale yields 5.1% and Terex 0.89%.
Terex scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Hyster-Yale), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HY | TEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $513M | $6.5B |
| Share price | $28.62 | $57.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.9% | 26.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.5% | 24.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 7,500 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.0× |
| P/FCF | 109× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | – |
| Fair value | $61.21 | $41.43 |
| Margin of safety | 53.2% (better) | −39.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.2% | 40.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4896% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5286% | −15.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.1% | 17.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.8% | 5.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.9% | 2.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.14% | – |
| Return on equity | −28.6% | 5.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.4% | 6.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.06 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.02 |
| Interest coverage | −3.1× | 2.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.07 (better) | 2.06 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.1% (better) | 0.89% |
| Payout ratio | – | 34.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | −1.6% | 1.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.6% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 48.4% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- HY stock overview
- HY income statement
- HY valuation and score
- TEX stock overview
- TEX income statement
- TEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.