Hexcel vs Rogers
HXL and ROG side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HXL and ROG compare
Hexcel is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Rogers ($6.2B against $2.3B).
On earnings, Hexcel is cheaper: it trades at 36.6× trailing earnings, against 51.7× for Rogers.
Hexcel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 6.7% for Rogers).
Hexcel keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.5% compared with 5.3% at Rogers.
Hexcel pays a dividend yielding 0.66%; Rogers does not pay one.
Hexcel scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Rogers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HXL | ROG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.2B | $2.3B |
| Share price | $81.53 | $130.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.2% | 53.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.5% | −51.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 5,563 | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.6× (better) | 51.7× |
| P/S | 3.1× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 4.7× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.1× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 29.4× | 24.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 4.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $68.97 | $96.27 |
| Margin of safety | −18.2% (better) | −36.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% (better) | 6.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.7% (better) | 0.20% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 149% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 162% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.2% | 32.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.2% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net margin | 8.5% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 10.4% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.9% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.71 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.57 | 4.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.11 | 8.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | – |
| Payout ratio | 31.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 4.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.2M | −$1.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- HXL stock overview
- HXL income statement
- HXL valuation and score
- ROG stock overview
- ROG income statement
- ROG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.