Haverty Furniture Companies vs Lovesac
HVT and LOVE side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HVT and LOVE compare
Haverty Furniture Companies is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Lovesac ($457M against $236M).
Haverty Furniture Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.0% versus 1.1% for Lovesac).
Haverty Furniture Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with 2.6% at Lovesac.
Haverty Furniture Companies pays a dividend yielding 4.5%; Lovesac does not pay one.
Haverty Furniture Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Lovesac), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HVT | LOVE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $457M | $236M |
| Share price | $29.28 | $16.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.8% | 14.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.4% | −79.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 2.15 |
| Employees | 12 | 917 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.5× |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.6× | 5.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.7% | 19.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $45.61 | $26.07 |
| Margin of safety | 35.8% | 37.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.29% | 16.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.5% | 38.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −21.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.9% (better) | 58.8% |
| Operating margin | – | 3.3% |
| Net margin | 2.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.6% | 8.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.69 (better) | 1.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.01 (better) | 2.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 92.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.6% | 98.0% |
| Held by insiders | 7.4% | 14.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$937K | $423K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 26.0% |
Go deeper
- HVT stock overview
- HVT income statement
- HVT valuation and score
- LOVE stock overview
- LOVE income statement
- LOVE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.