Huron Consulting vs Onterris
HURN and ONT side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HURN and ONT compare
Huron Consulting is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Onterris ($2.7B against $811M).
Huron Consulting grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.6% versus −9.1% for Onterris).
Huron Consulting keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with −1.4% at Onterris.
Huron Consulting scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Onterris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HURN | ONT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.7B | $811M |
| Share price | $167.18 | $23.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.02% | −4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 237% | −69.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 305 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.1× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 6.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.4× (better) | 18.6× |
| P/FCF | 16.5× | 11.6× (better) |
| PEG | 1.47 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | 8.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $156.49 | $38.65 |
| Margin of safety | −6.8% | 40.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | −9.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.3% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.0% | 41.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.3% (better) | 1.3% |
| Net margin | 6.4% (better) | −1.4% |
| FCF margin | 8.9% | 9.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 26.9% (better) | −2.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.3% (better) | 1.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.16 | 0.72 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.57 (better) | 5.04 |
| Current ratio | 1.71 | 1.88 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.41 (better) | 1.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 9.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.3% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 9.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M | −$5.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- HURN stock overview
- HURN income statement
- HURN valuation and score
- ONT stock overview
- ONT income statement
- ONT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.