StockData

Humacyte vs ProKidney

HUMA and PROK side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HUMA and PROK compare

ProKidney is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Humacyte ($342M against $164M).

ProKidney grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (55.2% versus 52.5% for Humacyte).

Humacyte keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3955% compared with −10288% at ProKidney.

ProKidney scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Humacyte), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHUMAPROK
Size and price
Market cap$164M$342M
Share price$0.592$1.13
Change, 1 year−56.2%−58.1%
Change, 5 years−94.6%−88.6%
Beta (5Y)2.061.32
Employees184231
StockData Score
Total score25 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S68.6× (better)418×
P/B9.1×–
FCF yield−53.9%−46.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)52.5%55.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin−475%–
Operating margin−4603% (better)−21665%
Net margin−3955% (better)−10288%
FCF margin−3697% (better)−19527%
Return on equity−1424%–
Financial health
Interest coverage−11.0× (better)−9327.2×
Current ratio3.348.36 (better)
Altman Z-score−10.29−1.12 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−7.1%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−7.1%
Ownership
Held by institutions26.4%16.1%
Held by insiders8.0%62.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$7.4K (better)−$1.1M
Short interest, % of float11.0%21.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.