Huckleberry.ai vs PagerDuty
HUCK and PD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HUCK and PD compare
PagerDuty is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Huckleberry.ai ($1.2B against $160M).
PagerDuty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.3% versus −0.99% for Huckleberry.ai).
PagerDuty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.2% compared with −13.4% at Huckleberry.ai.
PagerDuty scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Huckleberry.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HUCK | PD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $160M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $3.40 | $15.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −73.9% | −0.19% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.0% | −59.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.32 | 1.66 |
| Employees | 876 | 1,155 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.8× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | – | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.7× |
| FCF yield | −5.5% | 10.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $14.41 |
| Margin of safety | – | −8.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.99% | 2.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.7% | 18.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.4% | 84.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −9.8% | 6.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −13.4% | 37.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.8% | 25.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 89.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.28 | 2.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −12.82 | 1.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.59% | 16.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.59% | 16.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.0% | 92.9% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | 9.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$13.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.0% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- HUCK stock overview
- HUCK income statement
- HUCK valuation and score
- PD stock overview
- PD income statement
- PD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.