Huckleberry.ai vs CS Disco
HUCK and LAW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HUCK and LAW compare
CS Disco is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Huckleberry.ai ($427M against $159M).
CS Disco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.4% versus −0.99% for Huckleberry.ai).
Huckleberry.ai keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −13.4% compared with −18.5% at CS Disco.
CS Disco scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Huckleberry.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HUCK | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $159M | $427M |
| Share price | $3.39 | $6.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −74.7% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.0% | −85.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.32 | 1.45 |
| Employees | 876 | 577 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | – | 3.6× |
| FCF yield | −5.5% | −4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $6.02 |
| Margin of safety | – | −9.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.99% | 12.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.7% | 18.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.4% (better) | 74.8% |
| Operating margin | −9.8% (better) | −19.9% |
| Net margin | −13.4% (better) | −18.5% |
| FCF margin | −2.8% (better) | −11.5% |
| Return on equity | – | −25.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −134% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 0.28 | 3.54 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −12.83 | 3.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.59% | 0.13% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.59% | 0.13% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.0% | 54.5% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | 28.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | $3.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.0% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- HUCK stock overview
- HUCK income statement
- HUCK valuation and score
- LAW stock overview
- LAW income statement
- LAW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.