Hertz Global vs Sunbelt Rentals
HTZ and SUNB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HTZ and SUNB compare
Sunbelt Rentals is the larger company, worth 63 times as much as Hertz Global ($33.7B against $535M).
Hertz Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus 3.4% for Sunbelt Rentals).
Sunbelt Rentals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.9% compared with −3.8% at Hertz Global.
Sunbelt Rentals pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Hertz Global does not pay one.
Hertz Global scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Sunbelt Rentals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HTZ | SUNB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $535M | $33.7B |
| Share price | $1.50 | $82.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −76.3% | 26.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.8% | −2.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 26K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.1× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | – | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.4× |
| Fair value | $36.93 | $73.24 |
| Margin of safety | 95.9% (better) | −12.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.2% (better) | 3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −14.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | – | 19.6% |
| Net margin | −3.8% | 11.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 17.3% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.15 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.90 |
| Current ratio | – | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.20 | 2.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 35.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 117% | 80.3% |
| Held by insiders | 54.0% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$248K (better) | −$476K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- HTZ stock overview
- HTZ income statement
- HTZ valuation and score
- SUNB stock overview
- SUNB income statement
- SUNB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.