Fusion Fuel Green vs Schmid
HTOO and SHMD side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HTOO and SHMD compare
Fusion Fuel Green grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (798% versus 10.0% for Schmid).
Fusion Fuel Green keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −39.7% compared with −106% at Schmid.
Fusion Fuel Green scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Schmid), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HTOO | SHMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.20 | $2.09 |
| Change, 1 year | −71.1% | −63.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 120 | 734 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 798% (better) | 10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.0% (better) | 23.9% |
| Operating margin | −60.9% | 2.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −39.7% (better) | −106% |
| Return on equity | −45.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −56.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 8.29 |
| Interest coverage | −190.9× | 0.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.52 (better) | 0.37 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.95% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $309K |
Go deeper
- HTOO stock overview
- HTOO income statement
- HTOO valuation and score
- SHMD stock overview
- SHMD income statement
- SHMD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.