StockData

HomesToLife vs Lovesac

HTLM and LOVE side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HTLM and LOVE compare

HomesToLife grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.8% versus 1.1% for Lovesac).

HomesToLife keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.4% compared with 2.6% at Lovesac.

Lovesac scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for HomesToLife), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHTLMLOVE
Size and price
Market cap–$236M
Share price$1.18$16.33
Change, 1 year−62.9%14.7%
Change, 5 years–−79.9%
Beta (5Y)−0.452.15
Employees30917
StockData Score
Total score1214 (better)
Valuation score06 (better)
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–13.5×
P/S–0.3×
P/B–1.1×
EV/EBITDA–4.3×
P/FCF–5.2×
FCF yield–19.2%
Fair value–$26.07
Margin of safety–37.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.8% (better)1.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–16.8%
Net income growth (TTM)96.6% (better)38.8%
EPS growth (TTM)100%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–−21.8%
Profitability
Gross margin27.9%58.8% (better)
Operating margin5.1% (better)3.3%
Net margin4.4% (better)2.6%
FCF margin3.3%6.5% (better)
Return on equity66.5% (better)8.8%
Return on invested capital72.9% (better)10.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.26 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−0.55–
Interest coverage13.8×–
Current ratio1.201.47 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.07
Piotroski F-score66
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–3.1%
Shareholder yield–3.1%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%98.0%
Held by insiders94.8%14.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$423K
Short interest, % of float0.61%26.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.