StockData

Heartflow vs iRhythm

HTFL and IRTC side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HTFL and IRTC compare

Heartflow is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as iRhythm ($5.1B against $2.9B).

Heartflow grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.8% versus 21.6% for iRhythm).

iRhythm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.5% compared with −55.8% at Heartflow.

iRhythm scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Heartflow), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHTFLIRTC
Size and price
Market cap$5.1B$2.9B
Share price$59.10$88.68
Change, 1 year74.7%−49.7%
Change, 5 years–−11.5%
Beta (5Y)1.961.20
Employees8432,400
StockData Score
Total score59 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score34 (better)
Performance score03 (better)
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S24.2×3.4× (better)
P/B18.4×16.5× (better)
P/FCF–396×
FCF yield−1.2%0.25% (better)
Fair value$8.61$94.07
Margin of safety−586%5.7% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)42.8% (better)21.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–23.0%
Profitability
Gross margin80.1% (better)72.3%
Operating margin−37.8%−5.7% (better)
Net margin−55.8%−4.5% (better)
FCF margin−27.9%0.86% (better)
Return on equity–−25.8%
Financial health
Interest coverage−23.2×−3.7× (better)
Current ratio5.08 (better)3.57
Altman Z-score43.51 (better)2.04
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions86.0%108%
Held by insiders58.7%2.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$143M−$24.4M (better)
Short interest, % of float15.9%10.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.